| Basic Molecular Data 
  |  | Collision rate coefficients 
      |  | Collision rates
        maintained by S. Green at NASA GISS. |  |  | BASECOL database for
        ro-vibrational collisional excitation. |  |  | Collision rates between CO, CS,  OCS and  HC3N with  He and  H2 are presented 
        for temperature  up to 100K and  up to J=20. The rates are computed by solving quantum mechanical 
        equations. (from Green & Chapman, 1978ApJS...37..169G) |  |  | Summaries of  theoretical methods and 
         uncertainties involved in determining  collisional rate coefficients are given in books: -- Roueff, E., 1990, in Molecular Astrophysics, ed. T. W. Hartquist (Cambridge University Press), 232.
 -- Flower, E. 1990, in Molecular collisions in the interstellar medium, Cambridge Astrophysics Series (Cambridge: Unversity Press)
 |  |  | Ro-vibrational collision rates 
         of diatomic molecules: Chandra & Sharma, 2001A&A...376..356C. |  |  | LAMDA  database: 
         energy levels,  statistical 
        weights, Einstein  A-coefficients and 
         collisional rate coefficients of some astrophysically 
        intersting molecules are given. Collision rates are extrapolated to higher energies 
        (up to E/k ~ 1000 K). (from Schoier et al., 
         2005A&A...432..369S) 
          |  | Rate of collision is  where ncol is the number density of the collision 
            partners and gamma_ul is the downward 
            collision rate coefficient (in cm^3s^-1). 
            gamma_ul is the Maxwellian average of the collision cross section, 
            sigma, 
  where k is Boltzmann constant, mu is the reduced mass of the system, 
            and E is the center-of-mass collision energy.
 |  |  | The upward collision rate coefficient 
            can be derived through detailed balance as 
  where g is a statistic weight.
 |  |  | The collision coefficient rates of collisions with He and H2 at low 
            gas temperature can be roughly scaled to each other through 
  and if X is more massive than He and H2, the scaling factor is ~1.4. 
            This is because the cross section of H2 at J=0 
            state is equal to that of He. This formula works the best for 
            O->S substitutions (e.g., HCO+ -> HCS+). The values with H2, J=1 can be larger by factors of 2-5 due 
            to more interaction potential terms.
 |  |  | Uncertainties of collision rate 
            coefficients: -- Close-Coupling (CC) method: a few % (work well for low collision energies 
            and reltively light species);
 -- Coupled States (CSt) method: ~10% to a factor of 2;
 -- Infinite Order Sudden (IOS) 
            approximation: up to a order of magnitude.
 (the largest source of error is from the 
            potential surfaces and it is difficult to assess. The most 
            accurate method is that of Configuration Interaction (CI), but it is 
            time consuming. Other methods like Hartree-Fock Self-Consisten-field 
            (SCF), perturbation methods and Density Functional Theory (DFT), all 
            have its drawbacks. Electron Gas model is outdated, but still in use 
            in some cases.)
 |  |  | How to extrapolate collision rate coefficients from existed data: 
              |  | Linear molecules |  |  | If the basic downward rate coefficients gamma_ L0 (from other levels to 
                the ground level) are known, then the rate coefficients among 
                any pairs of levels can be calculated from 
  where the term in the large parentheses is the Wigner 3-j 
                symbol. This is valid only in the limit 
                where the kinetic energy of the colliding molecules is large 
                compared to the energy splitting of the rotational levels. 
                This limit can be overcome by multiplying to the part within the 
                summation with
 
  where
  and B0 is the 
                rotational constant in cm^-1, l is the scattering length in 
                angstrum (usually l ~ 3 A), mu is the reduced mass of the system 
                in amu, and T is the kinetic temperature in K. This formula can 
                be used to exptrapolate down to J=0 for both T and J. |  |  | The basic rate coefficient gamma_L0 
                can be extended from existed data set in either of two alternative 
                ways: # -- use
  , in 
                which y = dEul / kT, and a,b and c are parameters to be determined 
                from existed data (better over a larger range of energy, and can 
                be used for other level pairs, with uncertainty within 50%, 
                typically within 20%); # -- use
  to 
                fit existed data set to determine a, b and c. |  |  | Non-linear molecules |  |  | No general formula in this case. One needs to inspect the 
                existed data set and find an approximation function for
                the  extrapolation. Here is the example of SO2: 
  Here the left figure shows the trends of collision rate 
                coefficients over J and T, the right figure shows the dependence 
                upon DJ.
 |  |  |  |  | Rotational excitation rate coefficients
        of HC3N (J=0-50)
        with H2 and He
        at low temperature (5-100K) are obtained
        from extensive quantum (Close Coupling for J<=15) and quasi-classical
        (Quasi-Classic Trajectory method for J>15) calculations using new
        accurate potential energy surfaces (PES). The rod-like symmetry of the
        PES strongly favor even dJ transitions and
        efficiently drives large dJ transitions. Rates of
        ortho-H2 and para-H2 are similar at the low temperature, due to the
        predominance of the geometry effects. Population
        inversion is possible with the selective collision pumping in
        steady state with H2 density of 10^4-10^6 cm^-3. The collision rate
        coefficients are fitted with a formula: log10( K_J,J'(T)
        ) = SUM_n=0^4{ a_J,J'^(n)
        * x^n }
 in which K_J,J'(T) is the rate coefficient
        from upper level J to lower level J' at temperature T, a_J,J'^(n) are 5 coefficients (n=0,1,2,3,4)
        determined by fitting the accurate results and tabulated in their
        electronic table 1A, and x = T^(-1/6). All
        the collision rate coefficients can be reproduced from these fitted
        formulae. This is their procedure to calculate the collisioin rate
        coefficients:
 Part 1: calculate the potential energy
        surface (PES)
 define spatial grids to
        sample distance between HC3N-H2 and orientations =>
 use the direct parallel code
        DIRCCR12 to calculate the PES at each grid point =>
 use angular spline to
        represent the PES (using a scaling function Sf for larger
        distance)
 Part 2: dynamic calculation
 use MOLSCAT code to perform
        close coupling calculations for lower levels (J<=15) =>
 use Monte Carlo Quasi-Classic
        Trajectory (QCT) method for higher levels (J>15)
 Here is a space separated text version of the electronic table 1A: Wernli_2007A+A___464_1147W_tab1a.txt.
        (from Wernli et al., 2007A&A...464.1147W)
 |  |  | They calculated the rate coefficients among the first 41 rotational levels of the silicon monosulfide (SiS) molecule in its ground vibrational state in collision with para-
        and ortho-H. (from Klos & Lique, 2008MNRAS.tmp.1004K) 
 |  |  |  |  |  |